The Single Judge held the writ petition infructuous as the period for engagement of part-time resource persons had expired by efflux of time. The petition was disposed of without hearing since the petitioner was absent.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.10082 OF 2003
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
Heard Mr. R.P. Mohapatra, learned Additional Government Advocate.
Since the period of engagement of part time resource persons has already over, by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
The Petitioner
The State of Odisha
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
