The court dismissed an application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition. Finding no satisfactory explanation for a 334-day delay, the court dismissed the application and the underlying review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVWPET NO. 4 OF 2021
I.A. No. 2 of 2021 &
RVWPET No. 4 of 2021
to be provided and again there cannot be merely administrative reasons. Viewed in that light, there is an obvious failure in the present application to explain the inordinate delay in filing the review petition.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition can be admitted despite a delay of 334 days without a satisfactory explanation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Madhya Pradesh v. BherulalFollowed¶8
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bherulal, (2020) (10) SCC 654 · Who else cites this
Commissioner of Public Instruction v. ShamshuddinReferred¶8
Union of India v. Central Tibetan Schools Admin.Referred¶8
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Sabha NarainReferred¶8
State of West Bengal v. Soroj Kumar MondalReferred¶8
State of Andhra Pradesh v. M.Srinivasa RaoReferred¶8
Deputy Conservator of Forests v. Timblo Irmaos Ltd.Referred¶8
State
Dr. S. Muralidhar
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
