Santanu Pradhan v. Biswasini Pradhan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a revision under section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act challenging a direction to pay Rs. 10,000/- costs to set aside an ex parte maintenance order. The Court found no illegality or arbitrary exercise of discretion vis-a-vis the petitioner's army service. The revision was not inclined to be entertained and was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The revision application (RPFAM) was dismissed; the order directing payment of cost was upheld.