Iswar Ch.Mohapatra v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court held that the petitioner failed to procure instructions from legal heirs for substitution. The writ petition was disposed of abatement, impugned orders vacated, and records returned.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was disposed of abatement. The order dated 10th April, 2000 was vacated. Records to be sent back to the concerned Section.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
O.J.C. No.5187 of 1999
Iswara Chandra Mohapatra …. Petitioner
Mr. N.P.Parija, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. D.K. Mishra, Additional Government Advocate (Opposite Party Nos. 1 to 3)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition abates due to inability to obtain instructions regarding legal heir substitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Iswara Chandra Mohapatra
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court