Management,Elcosmos v. Industrial Tribunal
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the learned counsel for the petitioner stated he had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
OJC No.186 of 2001
The Management of ELCOSMOS …. Petitioner Electronics Ltd.
M/s. N. K. Mishra and associates, Advocates -versus-
…. The Presiding Officer, Industrial Opposite Parties Tribunal, Bhubaneswar and another Mr. J. Katikia, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER Order No. 21.09.2021 04. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that he has no instructions. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( B.P. Routray) Judge
M. Panda
The Management of ELCOSMOS Electronics Ltd.
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Opposite Parties Tribunal, Bhubaneswar
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court