Disposed
Baripadaspinningmill v. State
Orissa HCOJC/1250/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous due to the closure of the industry, and an earlier interim order was vacated.
What did the court decide?
The interim order passed earlier was vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
OJC No.1250 of 1999
¶3
Baripada Spinning Mill Mazdoor …. Petitioner Union
¶4
Mr. Srikar Kumar Rath, Advocate -versus-
¶5
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. M. S. Sahoo, AGA
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
¶8
ORDER
¶9
Order No.
¶10
14.09.2021
¶11
- Learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of closure of the industry in question. It is disposed of as such.
¶12
- The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Baripada Spinning Mill Mazdoor Union
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
Justice B. P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court