S.B.I. v. Bijaylaxmi Patro
Case brief
What is this about?
04.02.2021 In the wake of the pandemic…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP No.47 of 2006
Since on earlier occasions, i.e. on 07.01.2021, 21.01.2021 and 28.01.2021 no one had joined on behalf of the petitioner, this Court directed to list this matter today under the caption “Dismissal for Non-Prosecution”, so that the petitioner or their counsel can take proper notice of the same. But, today also, when this matter is called through V.C., no one joins on behalf of the petitioner.
From the aforesaid, this Court feels that the petitioner is recalcitrant litigant and not interested to pursue the present litigation.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order dated 14.11.2006 passed by this Court in this case stands vacated.
This order be communicated to the Court concerned forthwith.
…..….. …..……...…
S. Pujahari, J.
SKB
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court