The High Court of Odisha dismissed the CRLR application (CRLREV) as withdrawn by the petitioner who filed a memo to that effect during a hybrid hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No. 872 of 2019
Abhimanyu Mishra
…. Petitioner
Mr. Arun Kumar Das, Advocate
-versus-
Souri Shankar Parida
…. Opposite Party
None
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Order No.
ORDER 15.11.2021
The matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
Heard.
This is an application under Section 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 25.10.2019 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Balasore in I.C.C. No. 132 of 2019, allowing interim compensation of 20% of each cheque amount to the complainant.
Mr. Arun Kumar Das, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the CRLREV and files a memo to that effect. The same be kept on record.
Accordingly, the CRLREV is dismissed as withdrawn.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
( Savitri Ratho)
puspa Judge
Abhimanyu Mishra
Souri Shankar Parida
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
