Petitioner sought withdrawal of Criminal Revision No.100 of 2020 as the proceeding had become infructuous. Court recorded the withdrawal memo and disposed of the matter.
Criminal Revision disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.100 of 2020
Prasanta Kumar Swain
Petitioner
Mr. Devashis Panda, Advocate Versus
…. State of Odisha Opp. Party Mr.S.S.Pradhan, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No.
13.12.2021
Heard Mr. Devashis Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.S.Pradhan, learned Addl. Government Advocate.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this Criminal Revision, as the same has become infructuous. To that effect, he has filed a memo in Court today. The same be kept on record.
In view of the memo filed, the CRLREV is disposed of, as withdrawn.
.........................
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Bichi
Page 1 of 1
Prasanta Kumar Swain
State of Odisha
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
