The High Court declined to interfere in the criminal miscellaneous petition at this stage but informed the petitioner that they could surrender and move for bail based on the merits.
The bail petition was not interfered with; the petitioner was advised to surrender and move for bail on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 989 of 2021
Bishnu Charan Barik
… Petitioner
Mr. Manas Chand, Advocate
State of Odisha
… Opposite Party
Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing
Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
17.12.2021
Order No.
2.
Standing Counsel.
on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at
this stage. It is however open to the petitioner to surrender
before the courts below and move for bail, which shall be considered on its own merit.
A.K. Rana
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the bail matter at this stage.
Bishnu Charan Barik
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
