The High Court of Orissa disposed of a criminal remedy application. The Court held that lack of prima facie case under Section 306 IPC does not warrant interference at the cognizance stage, leaving grounds for the trial Court to consider.
The application was disposed of without interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 917 of 2021
Ashish Kumar Mallik & Others
….
Petitioners
Mr. L. Mishra, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
09.11.2021
Order No.
02.
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether materials on record show a case under Section 306 IPC at the stage of taking cognizance
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashish Kumar Mallik & Others
State of Odisha
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
