Dismissed

Bulu Bisoyi v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC23 Aug 2021CRLMC/690/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused to quash an N.B.W.(A) issued under Section 482 Cr.P.C. However, it permitted the petitioners to surrender within six weeks and obtain bail on conditions including cooperation with trial and deposit of security, provided they were not released on bail for the same or graver offence before.

What did the court decide?

Permission to surrender within six weeks and seek bail on terms including cooperation with trial and deposit of security.

Bulu Bisoyi Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

CRLMC No.690 of 2020

¶3

Bulu Bisoyi & another

¶4

…. Petitioners

¶5

-versus-

¶6

…. State of Odisha Opposite Party

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI

ORDER

Order No.

23.08.2021

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.

¶14

This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioners with a prayer to quash the order dated 03.01.2019 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Bhanjanagar, Ganjam in G.R. Case No.270 of 2001 issuing N.B.W.(A) against the petitioners.

¶15

Considering the facts and submissions made, I am not inclined to quash the impugned order. However, it is open to the petitioners to surrender before the Court in seisin over the matter within six weeks’ hence and if they surrender and move for bail, the Court in seisin over the matter shall allow them to go on bail on such terms and conditions as it may deem just and proper

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

including the conditions that they shall cooperate with the trial and shall deposit a cash security of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) before the court below.

¶19

However, the aforesaid is subject to verification of the fact that the petitioners were earlier released on bail for the selfsame offence or any graver offence, but for their nonappearance, N.B.W.(A) has been issued against them.

¶20

It is made clear that in spite of this order, if the petitioners after their release again make default in appearance, the cash security shall be immediately forfeited and in the next coercive steps to be taken to procure their attendance, this fact of their release shall also be reflected by the court in seisin over the

¶21

matter.

¶22

With the aforesaid order, this CRLMC stands disposed of.

¶23

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶24

(S. Pujahari) Judge

¶25

RKS

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Bulu Bisoyi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bulu Bisoyi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghunath Mandi Vs State of Odisha

Rajindra Dehury Vs State of Odisha

Pinku Behera Vs State of Odisha

Debendra Ku.Samal Vs State of Orissa

Priyanka Priyadarshinee Mishra Vs State of Odisha

Tapan Pattayat Vs State of Odisha