The High Court of Orissa dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash an order allowing re-examination of the victim. The court held there was no illegality or prejudice as the accused would have a further opportunity to cross-examine if new facts emerged.
The CRLMC stands dismissed and the interim order dated 9th December 2011 stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.4433 of 2011
Pradipta Kumar Sahoo
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
22.09.2021
5. Perused the impugned order passed.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
deposed in Court against the accused and, as such, the prayer was allowed. The same has been challenged in this case.
DA
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order allowing re-examination of the victim caused prejudice to the accused warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradipta Kumar Sahoo
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
