In a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 CrPC, the Court allowed the petition to quash the order of cognizance. The judgment notes that the informant had intimated the police to drop the prosecution, resulting in no viable chance of conviction.
The impugned order of cognizance was quashed and the prosecution against the petitioners was quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2212 of 2011
Sanjib Kumar Das & Others …. Petitioners
-versus-
State of Odisha & Another
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
ORDER
08.12.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
such they have no objection for quashment of the said proceeding. He further submits that the opposite party No.2informant has also approached the learned S.D.J.M.,(S), Cuttack to drop the said proceeding against the Petitioners.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
SKB
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of cognizance in the criminal prosecution filed against the petitioners should be quashed under Section 482 of CrPC.
Whether the condition for quashing the proceedings under Section 482 of CrPC exists given the informant's intimation to drop the prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjib Kumar Das & Others
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
