Single judge order listing criminal miscellaneous case heard via hybrid mode. Bench noted grounds suitable for lower court appreciation and dismissed further intervention, upholding the impugned order and disposing of the petition.
The impugned order is not interfered with; the petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 1663 of 2020
R. Rama Rao
….
Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Pati, Advocate
-Versus -
Lalu Kumar Bagh
….
Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_ 06.11.2021
Order No.
2.
petitioner.
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the impugned order of the Court below in criminal miscellaneous proceedings.
Whether the grounds of the case are suitable for appreciation by the Court below at an appropriate stage.
R. Rama Rao
Lalu Kumar Bagh
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
