Interim order allowing modification of an earlier order for surrender and conceding two weeks further time to the petitioner; however, the order is thin and does not state the substantive legal position.
Prayer for modification allowed; two weeks further time allowed to surrender; disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 1595 of 2021
Sridhar Sutar
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Mansingh , Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and another
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
14.10.2022
I.A. No. 1765 of 2022
Order No.
3. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Considering the submissions, prayer for modification is
allowed.
3. Two weeks further time is allowed to surrender as per order
dated 27.10.2021.
4. The I.A. is disposed of.
( Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge
B.C. Tudu
Page 1 of 1
Sridhar Sutar
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
