State of Orissa v. Babina Padhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Due to the pandemic situation for COVID-19…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLLP NO.78 OF 2016
Due to the pandemic situation for COVID-19, this matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode.
Heard.
Though the Opposite Parties/ Respondents were charged under Section- 307/34 IPC, they have been found guilty of the offence under Section 323/34 IPC.
Having perused para-8 of the Judgment, we are not inclined to grant leave to file appeal against the order of acquittal.
Accordingly, the CRLLP is dismissed. Authenticated copy of this Order downloaded from the website of this Court in the manner prescribed in this Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020 shall be treated at par with the certified copy of this Order.
………………………….
C.R. Dash, J.
…………………………. Savitri Ratho, J.
Subha
C.R. Dash
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court