The High Court of Orissa dismissed the criminal appeal as withdrawn by the appellant. The court granted liberty to file a back plan as per a previous Division Bench order, referencing Jindu vs. State of Odisha.
Criminal appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a back plan.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No. 440 of 2018
Gyanaranjan Jena
…. Appellant Mr. S. Banarjee, Advocate
Versus
State of Odisha
…. Respondent Mr. Anil Ku. Nayak, A.S.C. For O.P.I.D.
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER Order No. 16.11.2021 07. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. S. Banarjee, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Anil Ku. Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for O.P.I.D.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Sukanta
.........................
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal under O.P.I.D. Act should be admitted or dismissed upon request to withdraw.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jinu @ Jitendra Ku. Pradhan vs. State of OdishaReferred¶4
CRLA No.361 of 2018 (Jinu @ Jitendra Ku. Pradhan vs. State of Odisha)
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Gyanaranjan Jena
State of Odisha
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
