It reveals from the said Ext.1 that P.W.1 has put in the date as 08.10.2008 (Marked Ext.1/1). There has been an inordinate delay of more than two and half months in receiving that FIR which was firstly of all was entered in the Station Dairy Book of the Police Outpost by (P.W.6) and on that date, the same was sent to the IIC, Balliguda P.W. (P.W.7) who registered the case by drawing formal FIR. Nothing is stated as regards the said delay and the FIR (Ext.1) is silent as to any explanation on that score. All the above are going wholly unexplained. Moreover, when P.W.1 has stated to have sent Ext.1, by Post, P.W.6 has made no endorsement in that regard in Ext.1. The Informant (P.W.1), in his evidence, has simply said that since there was riots and curfew, he could not report the incident to the police. It is said that while in the relief camp, one Pravakar scribed the report for him, which he sent by Post to the Police Outpost. However, this Ext.1 does not find mention of any endorsement of that Pravakar nor his signature finds place thereon at any place. Said Pravakar has not been cited or examined as a witness from the side of the prosecution in saying to have written said report under the instruction of P.W.1 and he has not come forward to say that the FIR version is that of P.W.1 and nonelse. P.W.1 is also not saying that Ext.1 being written by said Pravakar had been readover to him and he finding the same to have been correctly written as stated by him, he had put his signature thereon. On the other hand P.W.6, the Police Officer attached to the Police Outpost states to have received this Ext.1 from P.W.1 who had presented the same to him. All these aspects of the case have also not been investigated by the Investigating Officer (I.O-P.W.7) to dispel the doubts.
