Dismissed
Chitrasen Rana v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCCRLA/318/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLA…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLA No.318 of 2021
Chitrasen Rana
…. Appellant
Mr.S.K.Joshi, Advocate
Versus
1.State of Odisha
2.Kumari Suravi Lakra
…. Respondents
Mr.K.K.Nayak, ASC (for Respondent No.1)
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No.
09.11.2021
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Heard Mr. S.K.Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.K.K.Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant- Chitrasen Rana under Section 14(A)(2) of SC & ST (POA) Act in connection with Kesinga P.S. Case No.145 of 2014 corresponding to C.T. Case No.09 of 2015 (Spl. Act) pending in the Court of learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bhawanipatna for commission of offence punishable under Section 376-D of I.P.C. read with Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST (POA) Act.
Mr. S.K.Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant states that in the meanwhile the appellant has been acquitted and hence the CRLA has become infructuous and he has filed a memo to that effect.
Considering the aforesaid submission, the CRLA is dismissed, as infructuous.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Bichi
1 of 1
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chitrasen Rana
State of Odisha
Kumari Suravi Lakra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court