Petitioner filed a contempt petition regarding compliance with a school/mass education order. The Court found the impugned order was already complied with; the contempt petition was dropped.
Contempt petition dropped as the order was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.217 of 2021
Krushna Chandra Saran & Ors.
Petitioner
Ms. S. Samal, Advocate
-versus-
Satyabrata Sahu & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
Order No.
22.07.2021
1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
2. Keeping in view the statement made by Mr. B. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for the School & Mass Education Department that the order sought to be complied with in the Contempt Proceeding, is already complied with in the meantime, this Court finds, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition to be adjudicated upon by this Court any further, which is hereby dropped.
3. As restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
Ayas Kanta Jena
Page 1 of 1
Krushna Chandra Saran & Ors.
Satyabrata Sahu & Ors.
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
