Contempt application by Purnima Sahoo was dismissed because the applicant properly instructed counsel to withdraw and not press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.7 of 2021 (Through hybrid mode)
Purnima Sahoo …. Applicant Mr.S.Satpathy, Advocate
-versus-
L.A.O.-Cum-Competent Authority …. Contemners (NH), Khurda & another
None
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
15.11.2021
Order No.
04. 1. Mr. Satpathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of
applicant and submits, his client erroneously applied for
contempt. He has instruction not to press the application.
2. The contempt application is dismissed.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
RKS
Page 1 of 1
Purnima Sahoo
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
