The single judge order of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack allowed a working summons for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution, vacated the previous dismissal order, and restored the main petition to its original file without elaboration.
The order dated 3rd August, 2021 recast the writ petition to be restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.349 of 2021
Somanath Mishra
…. Petitioner Mr. Jagdish Biswal, Advocate
-versus-
…. Union of India and others Opposite Parties Mr. Jayanta Kumar Bal, Advocate for Opposite Parties 1 to 4
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
20.12.2021
Order No.
CMAPL No.349 of 2021 and I.A. No.153 of 2021
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (B. P. Routray)
Judge
M. Panda
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a working summons (restoration application) filed under C.M.A.L. No.349 of 2021 and I.A. No.153 of 2021 should be allowed and carried forward?
Somanath Mishra
Union of India
The Chief Justice
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
