Chittaranjan Nayak @ Poda v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.9214 of 2020
Chittaranjan Nayak @ Poda …. Petitioner
Mr. P. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party
Mr. J.P. Patra,
Addl.Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
18.08.2021
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical Mode).
Mr. Tuna Sahoo, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Mr. P. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed by Mr. P. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner to make a mention before this Court for withdrawal of this bail application.
In view of the submission, the bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
Jagabandhu
Chittaranjan Nayak @ Poda
State of Odisha
S.K. SAHOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court