The High Court of Orissa disposed of a bail application filed by a petitioner accused under the NDPS Act. The court held that given the petitioner's prior history with a similar charge regarding drug possession and vending, the bail prayer was not reconsidered.
The Bail Application is dismissed. No further relaxation of bail conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.818 of 2021
Sk. Nasir Mohammed
…. Petitioner
Mr.J.K. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. Deepak Ranjan Parida, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 18.08.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
H
circumstances including the factum of involvement of the Petitioner in similar case as to possession and vending of Brown Sugar in public place; I am not inclined to re-consider the prayer for grant of bail to this Petitioner.
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the existing regular bail, subject to identical conditions applying to a previous similar case, can be extended with more relaxations?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sk. Nasir Mohammed
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
