The High Court dismissed the bail application, noting the petitioner remained in custody for a murder case with no change in circumstances, and directed the trial court to ensure an early conclusion.
Bail prayer dismissed; trial court directed to ensure early conclusion of trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.508 of 2021
Kunu Jena
…. Petitioner Mr. A. Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. Soubhagya Ketan Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 03.08.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
prayer for grant of bail to the Petitioner. It is however observed that the Trial Court would do well to take all such effective steps as provided in law for early conclusion of the trial in accordance with law.
Narayan
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite finding no change in circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kunu Jena
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
