Single judge bail order denying immediate bail prayer due to nature of allegations, allowing renewal after prosecution witness examination. No precedent cited or statutory provision applied.
Bail prayer not allowed; petitioner directed to renew prayer after examination of prosecution witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 4688 of 2020
Anil Oram
….
Petitioner
Mr. G.K. Rath, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
02.11.2021
Order No.
06.
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be allowed given the nature of the allegation.
Whether the petitioner is permitted to renew the bail prayer after examination of prosecution witnesses.
Anil Oram
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
