Allowed

Tapu @ Tapas @ Tapan Das v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC27 Apr 2021BLAPL/419/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack granted bail to an accused charged under Section 366 IPC. After hearing counsel and noting the petitioner's custodial duration, the court ordered his release on a bail bond with local sureties and subject to lower court conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bond of Rs. 50,000 and two local solvent sureties for the like amount.

Tapu @ Tapas @ Tapan Das Vs State of Odisha — Cheating and Forgery | Orissa HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No. 419 of 2021

¶3

Tapu @ Tapas @ Tapan …. Petitioner Das

¶4

Mr.S.K.Nayak (2), Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha …. Opp. Party

¶7

Mr.D.K.Pani, Addl. Standing Counsel

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

ORDER

Order No.

27.04.2021

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶16

This is an application for bail under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Chandabali P.S. Case No.233 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 530 of 2020 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Chandabali for alleged commission of offence under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhadrak vide order dated 13.01.2021.

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.12.2020, charge sheet has been submitted under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code and after hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin over the matter with further conditions as the learned Court below may deem just and proper.

¶20

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of. 8. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25^th March 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15^th April 2021.

( S.K. Sahoo)

Judge

PKSahoo

Page 2 of 2

Tapu @ Tapas @ Tapan Das v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tapu @ Tapas @ Tapan Das v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwini Kumar Patra Vs Republic of India

Ashwini Kumar Patra Vs Republic of India

Ashwini Kumar Patra Vs Republic of India

Subrat Kumar Ray @ Tita Vs State of Odisha

Kangali Behera Vs State of Odisha

Sashikanta Das Vs State of Odisha