The High Court of Orissa granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody, in a case involving offences under sections 294, 326, 307, and 34 of the IPC, directing his release on terms including a bond not to terrorize witnesses.
Petitioner released on bail with conditions not to terrorize or threaten prosecution witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.3862 of 2021
Rahul @ Bitu Nandi …. Petitioner
Mr. Prasanta Ku. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. Anupam Rath, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER 17.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
through the order passed by the learned CJM-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge; in the absence of any such impediment; it is directed that the Petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the court in seisin of the case with further condition that he will not terrorize or threaten the prosecution witnesses in any manner.
(D.Dash)
Judge
Aksethy
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in the pending criminal case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rahul @ Bitu Nandi
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
