The High Court disposed of the petitioner's bail application, noting he is in custody for sections 376D/294 IPC. The court declined to reconsider bail, directing the trial court to summon the I.I.C. to help locate and summon the victim for examination.
No bail granted. Trial Court directed to summon I.I.C. to locate and summon victim for examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.1339 of 2020
Prafulla Nayak & Another …. Petitioner
Mr. Amitav Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. Deepak Ranjan Parida, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER 13.08.2021
Order No.
mode.
Nayagarh running for alleged commission of offence under sections 376D/294/506, I.P.C., has filed this application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for his release on bail.
// 2 //
H
the victim. It is further directed that on receipt of summons from the Trial Court, the I.I.C., Sarankul Police Station shall make an inquiry as to the present whereabouts of the victim and make all such endeavors for service of summon upon her for her examination in the trial on the date as would be so indicated in the summon.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the second bail application regarding a sexual offence case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prafulla Nayak
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
