Debasis Parida @ Tiki v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
A BLAPL application filed by the petitioner was disposed of without any substantive order as the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw it.
A BLAPL application filed by the petitioner was disposed of without any substantive order as the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 1824 of 2021
Manjit Mishra …. Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus…. State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr. Karunakar Gaya, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
23.03.2022
Order No.
06.
(V. NARASINGH) Judge
Santoshi
Page 1 of 1
Manjit Mishra
State of Odisha
V. Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court