The Authority for Resumption of Business (ARB) No. 85 of 2019 was taken up by video conference. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petition would not be pressed. The court accordingly dismissed the ARBP as not pressed due to lack of pressing by the petitioner.
ARBP No. 85 of 2019 dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No.85 of 2019
Birat Chandra Dagara
…. Petitioners Mr.B. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd.
…. Opp. Party Mr.S.P. Mishra, Senior Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
18.06.2021
1.This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
KC Bisoi
Birat Chandra Dagara
Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd.
Dr. S. Muralidhar
KC Bisoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
