The Chief Justice allowed the petitioner to withdraw its arbitration petition via a video conferencing hearing.
Leave granted to withdraw the arbitration petition; A.R. petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No.63 of 2019
M/s. Uniexcel Group Holding Co. Ltd. ….
Petitioner
Mr. B.P. Das, Advocate
-versus-
…. National Aluminum Company Ltd. Opposite Party
Mr. Tanmay Mishra, Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Order No.
ORDER
05.07.2021
I.A. No.24 of 2021
ARBP No.63 of 2019
Page 1 of 2
March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Uniexcel Group Holding Co. Ltd.
National Aluminum Company Ltd.
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
