M/S.Siti Networks Ltd. v. Catv Committee,Nalco Nagar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner requested leave to withdraw vakalatnama. The ARBP was dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of alternative arrangements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No. 33 of 2019
M/s. Siti Networks Ltd.
…. Petitioner
Mr. N. Sarkar, Advocate
-versus-
CATV Committee, NALCO Nagar
…. Opposite Party
Mr. Bibekananda Bhuyan, Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Order No.
ORDER 03.09.2021
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
S.K. Jena/P.A.
M/s. Siti Networks Ltd.
CATV Committee, NALCO Nagar
S.M.ウル里 cidades Chief Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court