This court disposed of two petitions filed by the same counsel for duplicate cases. The counsel filed an affidavit expressing remorse, and the court concluded that no further proceedings were necessary, wishing him well in the future.
No further proceedings against the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9398 of 2021
Gitanjali Pradhan & others …. Petitioners
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party ABLAPL No.9386 of 2021
Order No.
Chitta Ranjan Rout & others …. Petitioners
-versus-
….
State of Odisha Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
ORDER
04.03.2022
1. Both the matters are taken up together through Hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
Judge
PKS
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the counsel filing duplicate cases should be proceeded against after depositing an affidavit of remorse.
Gitanjali Pradhan & others
Chitta Ranjan Rout & others
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
