A petition for pre-arrest bail was filed by husband and wife against matrimonial offences. The court held the petition for the first three petitioners was infructuous as they complied with summons, granting bail to the fourth petitioner.
Bail granted to Petitioner No.4 upon arrest; Petitions of Petitioners Nos.1 to 3 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.8700 of 2021
1. Sukadeba Samal …. Petitioners
2. Shanti Samal
3. Sukanti Samal
4. Pabitra Samal
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party
CORAM:JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER 17.09.2021
Page 1 of 3
// 2 //
Page 2 of 3
// 3 //
no other graver offence is reported against him besides the aforesaid offences.
10. The ABLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of.
Judge
RKS
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail applications for Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are maintainable given prior compliance with summons.
Whether Petitioner No.4 is eligible for release on pre-arrest bail in a matrimonial offence case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sukadeba Samal
Shanti Samal
Sukanti Samal
Pabitra Samal
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
