The Court rejected the Petitioner's successive application for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. Finding no change in circumstances, the prayer was dismissed, leaving regular bail applications to the trial court.
The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is not inclined to be reconsidered and the application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.3405 of 2021
Abinash Parida …. Petitioner Mr.S.K . Bhanjadeo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr.K.K. Das, ASC Mr.T.J.Pani, Advocate for the Informant
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 13.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Basu
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail should be reconsidered despite no change in circumstances.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Abinash Parida
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
