Dismissed

Banamali Jena v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC5 Jul 2021ABLAPL/1833/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed petitioners to surrender before the trial court in seisin within three weeks to move for bail release. It ordered a fixed deposit of Rs. 1.50 lakhs from petitioner No. 1 and Rs. 1.00 lakh each from others, subject to final trial orders, while acknowledging continuing COVID-19 restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to surrender in three weeks for bail; ordered specific fixed deposits conditioned on final trial order; COVID-19 printout provisions noted.

Banamali Jena Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.1833 of 2019

¶3

Banamali Jena @ Others …. Petitioners

¶4

Mr. Abhaya Kumar Parida, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

…. Opposite Party Mr. Abhaya Kumar Sharma, AGA

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

MR. JUSTICE D.DASH

ORDER 05.07.2021

Order No.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶15

Considering the submissions and on going through the materials as placed; further keeping in view the surrounding circumstances of the case as also concerning the Petitioners; it is directed that in the event, the Petitioners surrenders before the court in seisin of the case in connection with Jajpur Road P.S. Case No.166 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No.707 of 2018 pending in the court of J.M.F.C., Jajpur Road within three weeks hence and move for their release on bail on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the Court in seisin of the case with the further condition that the Petitioner No.1 without prejudice to his defence would deposit a sum of

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

Rs.1.50 lakhs and Petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 would deposit Rs.1.00 lakh each before the said Court which shall be kept under long term fixed deposit in any Nationalized Bank and would be renewed from time to time as the Court deems proper; whose disbursement/release shall be subject to the final order as would be passed at the conclusion of the trial.

¶19

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021.

¶21

(D. Dash)
Judge

¶22

Narayan

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Banamali Jena v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banamali Jena v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tridhara Mohanty Vs State of Odisha

Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India

Aarnabess@Pranabesh Das Vs State of Orissa

Deva Dirda Vs State

Chitaranjan Routray Vs State

Swadhin Parimanik Vs State of Odisha