The petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in Ghatagaon P.S. Case No. 124 of 2011 for alleged Section 394 IPC offence. The Single Judge, considering the nature of the accusation and absence of mala fide, declined to grant bail and dismissed the petition.
The prayer for release on pre-arrest bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.13252 of 2021
Dipu @ Sangram Samal @ …. Petitioner Sangrram Kumar Samal
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
06.11.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
actuated with mala fide, this Court is not inclined to release the Petitioner on pre-arrest bail.
DA
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted pre-arrest bail in a case of voluntary culpable hurt.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dipu @ Sangram Samal
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
