No petitioner appeared for an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution but granted liberty to revive the case or file a fresh one within the limitation period.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. or revive the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 1148 of 2020
Dukhiram Patel
…. Petitioner
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI ORDER 06.09.2021 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. No one appears for the petitioner, when the matter is called. No one also appeared for the petitioner on earlier occasions. 3. Hence, this ABLAPL stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is given to the petitioner, if so desire, to revive the petition within the time limit or file a fresh petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
Order No.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
MRS/SKB
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition is maintainable after non-prosecution.
Whether liberty can be granted to revive the petition or file a fresh one under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dukhiram Patel
State of Odisha
Justice S Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
