Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in a case involving misappropriation through ATM systems. Court refused bail due to need for custodial interrogation and risk of fraud.
Prayer for pre-arrest bail rejected; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.11207 of 2021
Bapuji Kanhar.
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
15.09.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
MRS
fraud and embezzlement of amount from different A.T.Ms as he is an insider and knew the system of operation of ATM machines. Hence, this Court is not inclined to release the Petitioner on pre-arrest bail.
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Bapuji Kanhar
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
