Justice S. Pujahari rejected the petitioner's application for pre-arrest bail in a case involving cheating, dowry-related offences, and sexual assault, holding the petitioner did not deserve release due to the nature and gravity of the charges.
Petition for pre-arrest bail rejected; petitioner advised to surrender and move for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.10307 of 2021
Amarjeet Pradhan
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: THE JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER 30.11.2021
Case No.69 of 2021 corresponding to C.T. Case No.206 of 2021 pending in the court of J.M.F.C., G. Udayagiri registered for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 417/493/376(2)(n)/294/500/34 IPC has filed this petition for his release on pre-arrest bail.
giving promise to marry had physical relationship with the
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
victim and also made her enceinte and out of such relationship, a child was born but later on, he duped her.
Court is of the view that the Petitioner does not deserve to be
released on pre-arrest bail.
immediately.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
PKS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to release on pre-arrest bail.
Whether the gravity of the offences precludes bail before arrest.
Amarjeet Pradhan
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
