Asish Kumar Hial v. Dist. and Session Judge, Nabarangpur
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the withdrawn writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.24495 of 2019
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Mr. A. Das : For the Petitioner None : For the Opp. Parties
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner by Video Conferencing mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. A memo with the same prayer has also been filed.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
As Lock-down period is continuing for COVID-19, learned counsel may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) (Mohammad Rafiq) Judge Chief Justice
Alok/Ashok
Mohammad Rafiq
B. R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court