Disposed
Karunakar Bal v. Regr.,Co-Op.Society
Orissa HCWP(C)/13047/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
The matter is taken up through video…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 13047 of 2003
The matter is taken up through video conferencing. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
Heard Mr. J.K. Khuntia, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash Annexures-12 and 13, by which the service of the petitioner has been terminated from the R.C.M.S. with effect from 01.01.2004.
Challenging the aforesaid orders passed in Annexures-12 and 13, this writ petition has been filed and this Court while entertaining this application, vide order dated 24.12.2003, passed interim order to the extent that the service of the petitioner would not be terminated for a period of eight weeks and, as such, the said interim order was continued from time to time. By virtue of the interim order, the petitioner continued in service till he superannuated from service on attaining the age of 60 years.
Mr. J.K. Khuntia, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 contended that since the petitioner has already retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation, nothing more survives to be adjudicated by this Court in the present writ petition. As such, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Ashok
…………….……………
The Petitioner
Opposite Party No. 2
Ashok
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court