Manarama Sahu v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through video…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMP No. 554 of 2020
- 01.07.2020
This matter is taken up through video conferencing.
Heard Mr. S.K. Padhi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State opposite parties, and perused the record.
The petitioner has filed this application against nonregistration of F.I.R. pursuant to complaint lodged in Annexure-1.
Considering the submissions made, the petitioner is permitted to pursue the remedy before the appropriate forum in view of the law laid down by the apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari V. State of U.P ., A.I.R. 2014 S.C. 187.
With the above direction, the CRLMP stands disposed of.
.…………….……………….
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State opposite parties
Coram
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court