The Court, without expressing an opinion on meritis, granted liberty to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. within two weeks to seek directions on the investigation of a registered case.
Liberty granted to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMP No. 3 of 2020
02 07.01.2020 Heard Mr. S. Rath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.K. Pani, learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the State opposite parties, and perused the record.
The petitioner files this application seeking direction to the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 to act upon the compliant lodged by the petitioner which has been registered as Nimapara P.S. Case No. 327 of 2019 and submit charge-sheet within a stipulated time.
Mr. D.K. Pani, learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the State, relying on the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Sakiri Vasu V. State of U.P. reported in ( 2008) 2 SCC 409 and Sudhir Bhaskar Rao Tambe V. Hemant Yashwant Dhage reported in (2016) 6 SCC 277 , submits that instead of moving the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C., the petitioner has unnecessarily rushed to this Court. He further submits that in the aforesaid decision, the Supreme Court has made it clear that when after registering the F.I.R., if no proper investigation is made, it would be open to the aggrieved person to file an application under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate and if such an application under Section 156(3) is filed before the learned Magistrate, he/she can direct for a proper investigation.
In such background, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C.
Considering the submissions made, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, grants
2
liberty to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. within a period of two weeks. In the event, such an application is filed, the jurisdictional Magistrate would do well to proceed with the same in accordance with law.
The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.
GDS
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether liberty can be granted to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for directions on investigation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu V. State of U.P.Referred¶4
Sakiri Vasu V. State of U.P. reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409 · Who else cites this
Sudhir Bhaskar Rao Tambe V. Hemant Yashwant DhageReferred¶4
Sudhir Bhaskar Rao Tambe V. Hemant Yashwant Dhage reported in (2016) 6 SCC 277 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
