The Single Judge dismissed a bail application filed by the petitioner for pre-arrest bail on the ground that no First Information Report (F.I.R.) had been registered against him. The court noted the petitioner appeared via Video Conferencing but no counsel appeared.
None; bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CORAM :- HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
ABLAPL NO.6501 OF 2020
Jatin Nayak @ Nalua.
…….. Petitioner
-Versus-
State of Odisha …….. Opp.party
O R D E R
03. 10.09.2020
In the wake of the Pandemic Covid-19, the case is taken up through Video Conferencing.
None appears for the petitioner through V.C.
As it is stated by the learned counsel for the State that no F.I.R. has been registered against the petitioner, the prayer made in this bail application by the petitioner for pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest is misconceived.
Hence, this ABLAPL stands dismissed.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court, if any real and substantial apprehension arises in future.
………………………… S.Pujahari, J.
MRS
2
3
4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application can be granted if no F.I.R. is registered against the petitioner.
Jatin Nayak @ Nalua
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
