The Court held that since the underlying U.A.P. Case No.580/95 had already been disposed of in the meantime, nothing survived in this matter to be adjudicated upon, and the writ petition was accordingly dropped.
Writ petition dropped as the underlying case (U.A.P. Case No.580/95) had already been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.9359 of 2012
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2, 3 & 4 that the U.A.P. Case bearing No.580/95, sought to be disposed of expeditiously, has already been disposed of in the meantime, it appears, nothing survives in this matter to be adjudicated upon by this Court, which is dropped accordingly.
.…….……………..… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
