accepted and they have also been extended the VRS benefit. Having availed the VRS benefit, subsequently they have turned around and claimed that since the services of the juniors to them have been regularized, they have filed this writ petition seeking for direction to reengage them and regularize their services. Once the VRS is accepted, question of re-engagement does not arise. The further contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that similarly situated persons had approached the industrial forum and they have been extended the benefit of re-engagement and regularization of services, but the same has not been placed on records for consideration. If the said benefit has been granted to the juniors to the petitioners, it is open to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum instead of pursuing the matter before this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum ventilating their grievances, if any cause of action survives.
