Mahabinayak Dev Jew v. O.S.F.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to the petitioner's absence up to the last chance date, holding it would have been deemed dismissed had counsel not appeared.
What the court decided
W.P.(C) No. 3237 of 2005
- 02.08.2019 On 19.07.2019, the following order has been passed.
“None appears for the petitioner.
In the interest of justice, as a last chance, the matter to come up on 02.08.2019.
It is made clear that if learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date, the writ petition will be deemed to have been dismissed.”
Even today none appears for the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed.
……………………..
K.S. JHAVERI (CHIEF JUSTICE)
………………………
K.R. MOHAPATRA, (JUDGE)
bks/jm
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
K.S. JHAVERI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court